CERACAT MAX HC Super High Capacity Filter for Very Large Iron Castings

The new CERACAT MAX HC is developed primarily to increase safe capacity to allow the use of filtration on larger iron parts.

The amount of Ductile iron  that will flow through it is in the order of x1.5-2.0 times that of a standard CERACAT MAX filter (or zirconia filter) per given area.

The ‘Flow Rate’ ie. metal passing through the filter per second we would recommend you  keep broadly the same but it will maintain consistency over the pour ie reducing the taper associated with the filter blocking.

Remember the gating system should dictate the ‘flow rate’ not the filter. We are not looking to force metal through the filter we need the metal to flow over the filter with oxides and small particles being retained on the ‘sticky’ surface of the filter structure.

The total area of the straight holes added to the MAX HC Filter is calculated to be maximum 50% of the ingate to the filter holder/pod. As a general rule the lower the flow rate per given area the higher the filtration efficiency.

FILTER SIZE NUMBER OF HOLES CAPACITY KG DUCTILE/GJS FLOW RATE KG/S
MAX 125 x 125 x 30 None 565 16.5
MAX HC 125 x 125 x30 16 x 6mm Dia 1100 16.5
MAX 150 X 150 X 30 None 810 24
MAX HC 150 x 150 x 30 25 x 6mm Dia 1620 24
MAX D200 x 35 None 1125 33
MAX HC D200 x 35 30 x 8mm Dia 2200 33
MAX D255 x 40 none 1750 52
MAX HC D255 x 40 41 x 8mm Dia 3450 52
MAX D300 x 50 None 2500 75
MAX HC D300 x 50 62 x 8mm Dia 4500 75

The above table is for guidance, like all of these charts much depends on metal cleanliness, filter position etc…

If you have a potential application you would like advice on or require a holder to incorporate a large filters into your gating system please contact us we’d be happy to help.

CERACAT MAX HC Used in High Capacity Ductile Iron Applications

Jobbing  foundries making large ductile iron castings have always had some unique difficulties and requirements with regard to filtration or indeed controlling flow to reduce turbulence during the pouring process.

A similar foundry making large steel parts would generally utilise bottom pour ladles and elaborate ceramic gating systems to reduce ingate velocities whilst enabling rapid filling etc generally the iron foundry faces much tighter pressure on margin. What in theory is ‘doable’ is very often curtailed by what is most practical.  For example the volume of moulding sand/binder is kept to a minimum resulting in very little space around the mould cavity for elaborate gating.

The sheer size of some of these parts give rise to other restrictions like the limit on mould height in relation to maximum crane height to be able to pour the ladle. There are many many factors that are not always immediately apparent to someone coming up with a ‘blue sky’ optimal gating system

Stress critical parts such as wind hubs are relatively thin in section and the effects of surface defects such as Dross and other inclusions can have a major impact on fatigue life.

Many foundries making large iron parts have utilised filters to some success but there are currently limitations to what is available from suppliers.

The grey silicon carbide foam filters that are available from many suppliers are very cheap but have limitations, some suppliers rate them as useable up to 1450 deg C but in reality survival of the filter is a function of temperature and pouring time and with bigger castings these SiC filters are soon overwhelmed.

The alternative is to then look at filters developed for steel, typically zirconia filters these can  operate up to 1700 Deg C and have no issue with iron temps and longer pouring durations. However they are significantly more expensive especially in bigger sizes. Typically the maximum size available in zirconia is D200 and on a good day you will only get around 1-1.5 tonne of SG iron through this size.

A typical method employed by iron casters is to put  multiple 150mmx150mm in an array in an expanded runner bar typically at the joint line of the mould sometimes 20-30 pieces or more, but  this is a compromise and again very much limited by casting geometry.

CAT developed CERACAT MAX some years ago to fill the gap between SiC and Zirconia and allow the production of larger pieces at a much more economic price, typically in sizes up to 300mm x 300mm . However the flow rate and capacity is still similar to zirconia ie D200 is around 1-1.5 tonne. These foam filters are limited by the coarseness of the PU foam available to manufacture them and 7-10ppi is the limit.

So how do we address this need for increased capacity, how can we get higher throughput of iron through a given area of filter.

One technique that is emerging and that will see significant development is the use of additive manufacturing ie 3D printing. A simple way is to print a coarser foam precursor and then make the filter with existing  filter production technology, this we are already seeing on the market.

A more significant move will be the commercial printing of ceramic directly, we and others are investing heavily in this area and development is now moving at pace, significant benefits can be achieved but again these pieces will not be cheap and we are still some time from having items made this way commercially available.

Which brings me to our latest product CERACAT MAX HC:

A  customer of ours based in the UK embarked on making a large ductile iron flask for the containment of nuclear waste with a high specification for an iron casting. It was proving difficult to achieve. They approached us to come up with a simple, reliable way to incorporate a filter/device that could take 3-4 tonnes SG iron throughput and be placed as close to the ingates as possible. They were using ceramic gating but in a relatively simple configuration due to tight constraints in the moulding box.

We always talk about ‘filters’ but in these larger castings their is a big requirement for ‘flow control’ taking the energy from the iron stream after flowing 3-4 meters straight down.

We could physically incorporate 4 D300 filters, however a standard CERACAT MAX filter at this size typically gives a throughput of 2.25-2.5 tonnes ,we needed to increase this.

We know that CERACAT MAX filters have a very high mechanical strength, for years we have supplied high chrome iron foundries hitting these filters in a direct pour application from 10 tonne ladles with a 70mm nozzle and typically a 1 meter drop without breakage.

By introducing holes (in the case of the D300-8mm Diameter by 50mm deep) we could increase the capacity significantly. However by doing it in a calculated way in relation to the ingate area of the filter holder and down sprue we can ensure  flow through the ceramic foam structure without jetting through the holes. If blocking of the ceramic foam starts to occur in the latter part of the pour the open hole area allows a consistent flow to remain.

The composition of the CERACAT ceramic gives it a high affinity to collect non metallic particles it is in effect very ‘sticky’ so a high degree of filtration still occurs

This new filter design we designated CERACAT MAX HC-‘High Capacity’

Shortly after this development our agent in the USA  told us of a requirement at a long time user of our CERACAT MAX filters that had started to make a flask for nuclear waste but were struggling to meet the MT and UT criteria and ideally needed a filter that would cope with a bigger throughput than standard

This Nuclear waste flask casting required a filter that could easily cope with 3 tonnes through a single piece

We looked at the gating system being used and gave some guidance on a system that would take 4 x D300 CERACAT MAX HC filters, for speed they also reached out to their local holloware supplier who converted a large pouring bell to take the filter.

These flasks are now in production with this technique and the improvement in MT & UT results are reported as dramatic.